Jim,
I have some users who have taken the time to learn Xwinplot, and they have
produced some nice spectra for publication. However, most users (myself
included) use plot. Xwinplot is nice in that it is wysiwyg, but frequent
use of the view command prior to plot works just as well.
One annoying thing is that you still have to set CY, and add the title,
integrals, etc. in Xwinnmr prior to using Xwinplot. It would be a lot nicer
to have a separate analysis/plotting program than just a plotting program.
Also I think it is easier to use plot for 2D contour plot with projection
spectra on the axes. In xwinplot, I have to work to get the correct data
selected for the projections. In edg, I just type in the dataset name.
Stephanie Mabry
--------------------------------------------
Stephanie Mabry, Ph.D., Instrument Manager
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry
1000 Hilltop Circle
Baltimore, MD 21250
office (410)455-1031
fax (410)455-2608
mabry@umbc.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Bloxsidge (by way of BUM
<bruker-users-mail@purcell.cchem.berkeley.edu>)
[mailto:j.bloxsidge@surrey.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:55 AM
To: BUM
Subject: XWin-Plot versus "plot"
Dear XWin-NMR users,
at the recent UK Bruker Users' Meeting, it became clear that quite a lot of
users did NOT consider XWin-Plot, in its present form at least, to be a
full and satisfactory replacement for the older "plot" function in XWin-NMR.
Mike Engelhardt said that he could not understand this. He felt that
XWin-Plot provided all the functionality of "plot" and more and that the
"plot" function was no longer needed. He asked for users to report their
problems with XWin-Plot, so that he could sort them out.
I have, so far, suggested to him that:
There is no proper "help" routine. The "help" links simply jump you into
the .pdf manual and that manual is out of date and (seriously) lacks detail.
Layout parameters can only be modified by poking around among the twigs of
the edit trees, without direct keyboard entry.
AUTOPLOT and "xwp", while they offer some useful functionality, are
insufficiently flexible. (Horizontal and Vertical scaling operations,
projections etc.)
As Bruker are not implementing "plot" in the Linux version of XWin-NMR and
do not intend to include it in future versions of the Windows version, we
need an XWin-Plot that is easier to learn and simpler to use. Please put
your observations on BUM, with copies to Mike Engelhardt.
Jim Bloxsidge.
*************************************************************
J P Bloxsidge Email: j.bloxsidge@surrey.ac.uk
Chemistry (C4),
University of Surrey Tel: +44-(0)1483-686852
GUILDFORD
Surrey GU2 7XH Fax: +44-(0)1483-686851
UK
*************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 17 2002 - 01:04:24 PST