Re: integration of 1D STD, relaible? (fwd)

From: Hussan, Syed (NIH/VRC) [E] <hussans@niaid.nih.gov>
Date: Wed Dec 29 2010 - 13:21:56 EST
Thank you very much for the very helpful hints to solve this basic problem. By working carefully on baseline correction, it made really a big difference and now I can get the absolute integrals reliably. 

Thank you very much
Very happy new year to all 

Syed

On Dec 29, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Chris Canlas wrote:

> Yed,
> 
> I am assuming you are trying to measure absolute integration, and
> without a reference standard? Please check if they were acquired with
> the same receiver gain and number of scans. And then make sure that
> you applied the same baseline correction for both.
> If you have a reference peak, it might be more straigthforward.
> Chris
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Bruker Users Mail
> <bruker-users-mail@chemistry.mcmaster.ca> wrote:
>> Please see below a question regarding Saturation Transfer Difference
>> experiments.
>> 
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> 
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe: Please send a note to
>> 
>>  bruker-users-mail-request@chemistry.mcmaster.ca
>> 
>> For subscriptions, please include a list of Bruker instruments you are
>> using, see http://www.chemistry.mcmaster.ca/bum/BUM.txt
>> E-mail archives are at:
>> http://www.chemistry.mcmaster.ca/bum
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 09:39:37 -0500
>> From: "Hussan, Syed (NIH/VRC) [E]" <hussans@niaid.nih.gov>
>> To: "'bruker-users-mail@chemistry.mcmaster.ca'"
>>    <bruker-users-mail@chemistry.mcmaster.ca>
>> Subject: integration of 1D STD, relaible?
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Bruker users
>> 
>> I am working with STD experiments to measure the binding constant of a
>> ligand. When I use higher ligand excess, I obviously get larger STD effect
>> as compared to one which obtained with very little ligand excess.
>> Qualitatively it looks fine. But when I integrate an isolated STD peak by
>> using Topspin 1.3, I do not get the integral value in accordance with the
>> apparent relative signal intensity in two experiments. Ironically, once a
>> signal which looks less than 50 % of the other, its integral value is higher
>> than the apparent larger signal. Could any one guide me to obtain the
>> integral values of STD 1D in a very reliable way. Is there any other
>> reliable software other than topspin? I do not have access to xwin any more.
>> 
>> 
>> With best wishes and happy new year
>> 
>> yed
>> 
Received on Wed Dec 29 13:22:12 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 04 2011 - 09:15:21 EST